Asthma can be classified into T2 high and T2 low asthma based on the criteria for onset, with an estimated frequency of about 50% each. In addition, according to research by the Korean National Health Insurance Corporation, about 80-90% of asthma patients in Korea fall into the mild to moderate range.
Current guidelines recommend the use of inhaled steroid (ICS) treatment for all patients with mild to moderate asthma. However, ICS is a treatment targeted towards T2 high asthma, which is primarily caused by eosinophils, and may not be effective in T2 low asthma, which accounts for about 50% of patients. Despite this, the current guidelines recommend the use of ICS for T2 low asthma patients for life, leading to significant economic and public health losses due to the overuse of inhaled steroids.
Therefore, it is believed that in T2 low asthma patients in the mild to moderate range, treatment with bronchodilators without ICS may show inferior clinical results compared to ICS-containing treatment regimens.
A study with a similar concept has recently been published in the New England Journal of Medicine, proving the effectiveness of a similar concept to the proposed research topic. Therefore, it is believed that conducting this proposed study in Korea will not only lead to changes in international asthma guidelines, but also prevent the unnecessary overuse of ICS in Korean patients.
A multicenter prospective randomized controlled trial to generate evidence that bronchodilator therapy with long-acting muscarinic antagonist (LAMA) without inhaled steroids (ICS) is inferior to ICS-containing treatment regimens for mild T2 low asthma.